A benign outlook for both the headline and core inflation rates makes a case for real interest rates to be lower, said Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Sanjay Malhotra, explaining his vote for a 25 basis-point cut in the repo rate in the December Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting, as the cut will likely stimulate demand and be support growth, the minutes of the meeting, released on Friday, showed.
Additionally, Malhotra said real growth in gross domestic product (GDP) was poised to exceed 7 per cent this financial year (FY26), much above the earlier expectations of 6.5 per cent, because healthy domestic prospects outweighed concerns on the external front.
“Domestically, H1 witnessed strong growth, driven by several positive domestic factors viz., direct and indirect tax rationalisation, monetary easing, conducive financial conditions and benign inflation,” Malhotra said, adding that although domestic economic activities remained resilient in Q3, weakness in some leading high-frequency indicators suggested deceleration in growth momentum in H2 vis-à-vis H1.
“Overall, real GDP growth is poised to exceed 7 per cent, much above our expectation of 6.5 per cent at the beginning of the year, as healthy domestic prospects outweigh the concerns on the external front. Going forward in H1 next year, domestic growth is projected to remain strong, though moderate to 6.7-6.8 per cent,” he said.
Malhotra also said he was in favour of retaining the “neutral” stance because it gave the requisite flexibility to the MPC to remain data-dependent and act in accordance with the evolving macroeconomic conditions and outlook.
Against the backdrop of subdued inflation and steady growth, the members of the MPC said policy conditions allowed room to support the economy. The panel, therefore, unanimously lowered the repo rate by 25 basis points to 5.25 per cent and maintained a “neutral” stance, although external member Ram Singh argued for changing the stance to “accommodative”.
Singh said that the inflation data made a strong case for an additional rate cut and underscored its urgency.
“A delay in the rate cut would hurt real GDP growth by keeping real interest rates unnecessarily above growth-supportive levels. The delay will extend the low-inflation phase, which has important implications both micro and macro including a less-than expected nominal GDP growth,” Singh said.
He further said the subdued price momentum in both headline and core consumer price indices, along with the need to support growth, warranted a shift in the policy stance to “accommodative”.
According to the minutes, the rate-setting panel observed that the inflation rate had eased more than expected, led by unusually soft food prices, and was now likely to remain below earlier estimates.
The core inflation rate, after firming up over the past year, showed early signs of cooling in the latest quarter and was expected to stay well contained. Both the headline and core inflation rates are projected to align close to the 4 per cent target in the first half of 2026–27, with underlying price pressures even milder after adjusting for higher precious metal prices.
Poonam Gupta, deputy governor, who too voted for a 25 basis-point cut, said that the cumulative 125 basis-point rate cut during the current cycle did not pose a threat of overheating. She said not only the headline and core inflation rates but also most other nominal indicators remained at levels that showed no signs of overheating. Instead, the data suggests that some slack still persists in the economy.
“One may ask whether the current rate cut, resulting in a cumulative rate cut of 125 bps, could lead to overheating in the economy. However, not just headline and core inflation, but most other nominal indicators of the economy are prevailing at levels that indicate that the economy at this point is not showing any signs of overheating. Instead, one could interpret the data as indicating that there is slack in the economy,” she said.
Meanwhile, external member Nagesh Kumar said the inflation rate was too low, breaching the lower bound of the flexible inflation-targeting framework, particularly when the impact of precious metals such as gold was excluded. He added that a persistently low inflation rate was unhealthy for a developing economy like India as it pointed to weak demand.
Kumar also said the monetary policy had room to support growth, noting that the transmission of the cumulative 100 basis-point repo rate cut over the past year was largely complete. With the headline inflation rate at just 0.3 per cent in October and the full-year inflation rate for 2025-26 projected at 2 per cent, he said conditions were conducive for further policy action.
External member Saugata Bhattacharya said that while overall financial conditions remained accommodative, there was a concern that the current real policy rate might be somewhat tighter than what near-term macroeconomic conditions justified. Despite reservations about the potential impact of lower interest rates on household savings and bank-deposit mobilisation, the immediate priority, in balancing multiple objectives, should tilt towards supporting growth.
“I believe that the cumulative policy rate cuts and liquidity infusions will now have moved the orientation of monetary policy from mildly restrictive to balanced. Pending incoming data, I believe the policy interest rate is now consistent with macroeconomic stability,” he said.
Indranil Bhattacharyya, executive director, RBI, highlighted that given the neutral policy stance, lower realised inflation and a downward revision in the inflation outlook justified a reduction in the nominal policy rate. At the same time, retaining the “neutral” stance allows policymakers to remain data-dependent and respond flexibly to evolving conditions without being constrained by pre-commitment in an uncertain environment.