Giving anticipatory bail in NDPS Act case 'very serious' issue: SC

It issued notice to the state of West Bengal on the accused's bail plea and posted it for hearing after four weeks

Supreme Court, SC
Grant of anticipatory bail in a NDPS matter is a very serious issue, top court said. (Photo: Shutterstock)
Press Trust of India New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Sep 19 2024 | 1:50 PM IST

Granting anticipatory bail in a case registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act is a "very serious" issue and "unheard of", the Supreme Court said on Thursday.

A bench headed by Justice B R Gavai and also comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and K V Viswanathan was hearing a plea filed by an accused seeking regular bail in a case lodged for alleged offences under provisions of the NDPS Act in West Bengal.

The bench directed the West Bengal government to consider whether the state proposes to file an application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to four accused in a case.

It issued notice to the state of West Bengal on the accused's bail plea and posted it for hearing after four weeks.

The petitioner's counsel told the bench that four of the six accused in the case were granted pre-arrest bail while one of them was on regular bail.

"In NDPS matter, anticipatory bail?" the bench wondered. "In NDPS matter, anticipatory bail is unheard of," it said.

"We can issue notice (on the plea) and direct the state to file an application for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the co-accused," the court observed.

"Grant of anticipatory bail in a NDPS matter is a very serious issue. We, therefore, direct the state to consider whether it proposes to file an application for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the co-accused," the top court said.

In the plea, the accused challenged the Calcutta High Court's order of July this year dismissing his application seeking regular bail in the case lodged in October 2023.

"The samples that were sent to FSL have tested positive indicating that the materials seized from the petitioner are contraband," the high court had said in its order.

"In view of commercial quantity of 'ganja' being involved and keeping in mind the restrictions in section 37 of the NDPS Act, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage," it said.


(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme CourtNarcoticsdrugs

First Published: Sep 19 2024 | 1:50 PM IST

Next Story