Govt remains silent on question of reintroducing law on judges' appointment

The NJAC came into focus again after half-burnt wads of cash were allegedly found from the official residence of a Delhi High Court judge here

Modi, Narendra Modi, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Arjun Ram, Meghwal, Arjun
Meghwal also shared details on how the government and the SC Collegium were in touch to update memorandum of procedures. | File Photo: PTI
Press Trust of India New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Apr 03 2025 | 7:51 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The government on Thursday maintained silence on whether it will consider bringing again the National Judicial Appointments Commission bill to overturn the present collegium system to appoint judges.

Responding to a question on the government's "view" relating to the National Judicial Appointments Committee (NJAC) and whether it would "again consider" bringing in the NJAC legislation, Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal gave a detailed response on what the now struck down law sought to do.

But he was silent on whether the government will consider bringing the NJAC bill.

In a written response in Rajya Sabha, he said to replace the Collegium system of appointments of judges of the Supreme Court and the high courts with a "more broad-based, transparent, accountable appointment mechanism" and to bring greater objectivity in the system, the Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 and the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 were brought. These laws came into force on April 13, 2015.

However, both the laws were challenged in the Supreme Court which later declared them as unconstitutional and void.

The Collegium system as existing prior to the enforcement of the laws was declared to be operative.

The minister also shared details on how the government and the SC Collegium were in touch to update memorandum of procedures -- a set of documents which guide the appointment, elevation and transfer of Supreme Court and high court judges.

The NJAC came into focus again after half-burnt wads of cash were allegedly found from the official residence of a Delhi High Court judge here.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme CourtJudges' appointmentSC judgesjudicial appointments

First Published: Apr 03 2025 | 7:51 PM IST

Next Story