PIL in HC says hooch victims not freedom fighters, opposes compensation

The petitioner said that it was not clear and justified on what basis the state government was granting a lesser solatium to victims of fire or any other accident

Madras High Court, Madras HC,
When the PIL filed by Mohamed Ghouse came up for hearing on Friday, a division bench orally said that the compensation amount was on the higher side and posted after two weeks, further hearing of the case. | Photo: ANI
Press Trust of India Chennai
2 min read Last Updated : Jul 05 2024 | 12:54 PM IST

A Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the Madras High Court to strike down the Tamil Nadu government order providing Rs 1,000,000 compensation to all the victims of the Kallakurichi hooch tragedy.

When the PIL filed by Mohamed Ghouse came up for hearing on Friday, a division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice R Mahadevan and Justice Mohammed Shafiq orally said that the compensation amount was on the higher side and posted after two weeks, further hearing of the case.

''The victims were not freedom fighters or social activists who have lost their lives for the cause of the general public or for the sake of the society and had committed an illegal act by consuming spurious liquor,'' he submitted.
 

According to Ghouse, ''Consuming illicit liquor was an illegal act. The state need not have pity on those who consumed illicit liquor and thereby committed an illegal act and consequently succumbed to such an act.''

He said that solatium should be given only to the victims of accidents and not to those who have committed an illegal act for their own pleasure.

''The order of compensation to all the hooch tragedy victims was unreasonable and arbitrary and the consumers of illicit liquor must be denied the compensation and they must not be treated as victims,'' he added.

The petitioner said that it was not clear and justified on what basis the state government was granting a lesser solatium to victims of fire or any other accidents and at the same time granting a huge amount to hooch tragedy victims.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :PILhooch deathsLiqour banMadras HC

First Published: Jul 05 2024 | 12:54 PM IST

Next Story