Anugrah Stock & Broking case: SAT quashes Edelweiss Custodial appeal

SAT has upheld the order by the committee

gavel, Insolvency, IBC, firms
Khushboo Tiwari Mumbai
2 min read Last Updated : Dec 15 2023 | 11:36 PM IST
The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) on Friday dismissed an appeal by Edelweiss Custodial Services (now Nuvama) in a matter related to Anugrah Stock and Broking where the brokerage misused client securities worth Rs 450 crore.

Edelweiss Custodial appealed against an order of the Core Settlement Guarantee Fund Committee of NSE Clearing, which directed it to reinstate the securities and return the shares to the clients, which were wrongly sold off.

Edelweiss Custodial provided clearing services to Anugrah for trades taken in the derivatives segment and collected collateral for the margin requirements. Most of these collaterals were in the form of shares.

However, in 2020 Anugrah failed to pay the dues, and to recover them, Edelweiss sold the collaterals to the tune of Rs 460 crore and used the proceeds to meet the clearing obligations towards NSE Clearing.

In its order, the committee of NSE Clearing said Edelweiss failed to perform adequate due diligence while handling client securities and failed to ensure that the clients’ securities were only utilized for meeting the clients’ obligations.

SAT has upheld the order by the committee.

“The innocent clients whose securities have been, thus, misused/misappropriated, cannot be deprived of their right to get back their shares,” noted SAT.

The tribunal pointed out that directing the restitution of the shares was essential for the public to have faith in the system.

“It would be a travesty of justice and undermine the regulation of the markets if any intermediary is permitted to misuse/misappropriate clients’ securities by selling off the same unilaterally when the concerned investor has no outstanding obligation or liability, and then permitting the intermediary to benefit from the same at the cost of the expense of the investors,” noted Justice Tarun Agarwala in the order.

The tribunal added that ‘an innocent party cannot be made to suffer or be deprived of his property’.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Edelweiss Asset ManagementSecurities Appellate Tribunalbrokerage defaultBroking firms

First Published: Dec 15 2023 | 9:43 PM IST

Next Story