Australia mulls jail term for high-risk migrants who breach visa conditions

Australia said it has released 84 foreigners most of whom have convictions for crimes including murder and rape since the court ruled last week that their indefinite detention is unconstitutional.

US Immigrations, immigrants, border, us-mexico, Security
The decision reversed a High Court ruling from 2004 that had allowed stateless people to be held in migrant centers for any length of time in some cases. (Representative)
AP Canberra
3 min read Last Updated : Nov 16 2023 | 12:40 PM IST

Migrants with criminal records in Australia will face up to five years in prison for breaching their visa conditions under emergency legislation introduced Thursday in response to a High Court ruling that foreigners can't be detained indefinitely.

The government said it has released 84 foreigners most of whom have convictions for crimes including murder and rape since the court ruled last week that indefinite detention of migrants is unconstitutional.

The decision reversed a High Court ruling from 2004 that had allowed stateless people to be held in migrant centers for any length of time in cases where there were no prospects of deporting them from Australia.

The legislation introduced in Parliament by Immigration Minister Andrew Giles would let the government order certain migrants to wear electronic tracking bracelets and to comply with curfews. Failure to comply with those visa conditions could be a criminal offense punishable by up to five years in prison.

The released migrants include certain individuals with serious criminal histories, Giles told Parliament.

These measures are consistent with the legitimate objective of community safety, and the rights and interests of the public, especially vulnerable members of the public, Giles said.

Human rights lawyers argued that the measures could be challenged in court as punitive and excessive.

Any new conditions must meet some basic tests. They must be necessary, they must be reasonable, proportionate, they must not be punitive or deprive people unnecessarily of their liberty, said David Manne, a lawyer who represents several of the released migrants.

We shouldn't readily be handing to the government extraordinary powers to impose severe restrictions on our lives without proper scrutiny. It's hard to see how there has been proper scrutiny given how urgently this has all been introduced, Manne added.

The government has given assurances that migrants have been released under strict visa conditions, with some required to report to police daily. Manne said some of his clients were initially freed from detention centers without visas in the government's haste to comply with the court verdict.

The legislation was pushed through the House of Representatives on Thursday morning and will now be considered by the Senate.

Opposition leader Peter Dutton, whose conservative party could ensure that the center-left government's measures are passed by the Senate, described the proposals as inadequate to ensure community safety.

"These are people who have committed serious offenses and the likelihood of them reoffending is very, very high, Dutton said.

Opposition senators are likely to propose their own amendments.

The minor Greens party opposed what they described as anti-refugee laws.

These are draconian laws that provide the minister with powers never before seen in Australia and the Greens will not be supporting them, Greens immigration spokesperson Sen. Nick McKim said in a statement.

Giles said further legislation would be considered once the High Court's seven judges publish the reasoning for their decision.

All the released migrants previously had their visas canceled or had been refused visas because of their criminal records or other evidence of poor character. They were ordered into indefinite detention because they had no reasonable prospects of being deported to a country that would accept them.

They include Afghans, a nationality that Australia has stopped deporting since the Taliban seized power in their homeland. They also include Iranians, because Iran will only repatriate Iranians who return voluntarily.

The test case was brought by a member of Myanmar's persecuted Rohingya Muslim minority, identified in court as NZYQ, who was convicted of raping a 10-year-old boy in Sydney and sentenced to five years in prison. He was put in indefinite detention after prison.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :AustraliaMigrantsmigrant crisis

First Published: Nov 16 2023 | 12:40 PM IST

Next Story