Judge orders June trial for US government's felony case against Boeing

Lawyers for the aerospace company and the justice department have spent months trying to renegotiate a July 2024 plea agreement that called for Boeing to plead guilty to a single felony charge

Boeing
judge focused his negative assessment on the process for selecting an outsider to keep an eye on Boeing's actions to prevent fraud (Photo: Reuters)
AP Austin
4 min read Last Updated : Mar 26 2025 | 8:53 AM IST

A federal judge in Texas has set a June trial date for the US government's years-old conspiracy case against Boeing for misleading regulators about the 737 Max jetliner before two of the planes crashed, killing 346 people.

US district judge Reed O'Connor did not explain in the scheduling order he issued on Tuesday why he decided to set the case for trial.

Lawyers for the aerospace company and the justice department have spent months trying to renegotiate a July 2024 plea agreement that called for Boeing to plead guilty to a single felony charge.

The judge rejected that deal in December, saying that diversity, inclusion and equity policies the justice department had in place at the time might influence the selection of a monitor to oversee the company's compliance with the terms of its proposed sentence.

Since then, O'Connor had three times extended the deadline for the two sides to report how they planned to proceed. His most recent extension, granted earlier this month, gave them until April 11 to "confer on a potential resolution of this case short of trial".

The judge revoked the remaining time with his Tuesday order, which laid out a timeline for the proceedings leading up to a June 23 trial in Fort Worth.

While the US Department of Justice declined to comment on the judge's action, a Boeing statement shed no light on the status of the negotiations.

"As stated in the parties' recent filings, Boeing and the Department of Justice continue to be engaged in good faith discussions regarding an appropriate resolution of this matter, the company said.

The deal the judge refused to approve would have averted a criminal trial by allowing Boeing to plead guilty to conspiring to defraud Federal Aviation Administration regulators who approved minimal pilot-training requirements for the 737 Max nearly a decade ago.

More intensive training in flight simulators would have increased the cost for airlines to operate the then-new plane model.

The development and certification of what has become Boeing's bestselling airliner became an intense focus of safety investigators after two of Max planes crashed less than five months apart in 2018 and 2019.

Many relatives of passengers who died off the coast of Indonesia and in Ethiopia have pushed for the prosecution of former Boeing officials, a public criminal trial and more severe financial punishment for the company.

In response to criticism of last year's plea deal from victims' families, the prosecutors said they did not have evidence to argue that Boeing's deception played a role in the crashes.

The prosecutors told O'Connor the conspiracy to commit fraud charge was the toughest they could prove against Boeing.

O'Connor did not object in his December ruling against the plea agreement to the sentence Boeing would have faced: A fine of up to $487.2 million with credit given for $243.6 million in previously paid penalties; a requirement to invest $455 million in compliance and safety programs; and outside oversight during three years of probation.

Instead, the judge focused his negative assessment on the process for selecting an outsider to keep an eye on Boeing's actions to prevent fraud.

He expressed particular concern that the agreement requires the parties to consider race when hiring the independent monitor in keeping with the (justice) department's commitment to diversity and inclusion".

In a case of this magnitude, it is in the utmost interest of justice that the public is confident this monitor selection is done based solely on competency. The parties' DEI efforts only serve to undermine this confidence in the government and Boeing's ethics and anti-fraud efforts, O'Connor wrote.

An executive order President Donald Trump signed during the first week of his second term ended diversity, equity and inclusion programs across the federal government, likely rendering the judge's concerns moot.

Trump's return to office also means the justice department's leadership has changed since the federal prosecutors decided last year to pursue the case against Boeing.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :BoeingUS governmentCourt casescourt orders

First Published: Mar 26 2025 | 8:53 AM IST

Next Story