Mr Bougon refers to the “tranquil assurance of heirs” that Mr Xi exudes and this is clearly linked to his being a “princeling”, with a sense of entitlement when it comes to leading the Party and the country. The Party is like a family inheritance, which must be preserved and renewed. The circumstances may change but the centrality of the Party’s leadership must remain intact. The book brings out an important difference between Deng Xiaoping, who initiated China’s market-based reforms, and Mr Xi’s approach. Deng had not only introduced a market economy with a role for private sector, but distanced the Party from State administration and transformed the armed forces into a professional and well-trained organisation. Rising economic prosperity was accompanied by a significant expansion in individual choice, a relative tolerance of critical media and some limited room for intellectual dissent.
Mr Xi has introduced major departures from this approach by bringing Party leadership and involvement front and centre into governance by the State, economic and enterprise management and leadership of the armed forces. This centrality of Party leadership is linked to the indispensable role of the singular leader and in that sense, Deng’s emphasis on collective leadership and institutionalised succession does not correspond to the classic Leninist state that Mr Xi believes is right for China. There has been a severe crackdown on any form of dissent. New digital technologies are being harnessed to establish a truly pervasive and efficient surveillance state. Party Committees are now mandatory not only in State Owned Enterprises (SOE) but also in private companies. The diminishing role of the SOEs has been reversed as they are now expected to be the champions in establishing China’s lead in new domains such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, aerospace and electronic vehicles.