ED searches BPSL's resolution professional, probes 'irregularities' in ties

Beleaguered steel firm batting money laundering charges, forcible possession of its assets

probe
An ED official said that three places in Delhi and one in Gurugram were searched in connection with a money laundering probe
Shrimi ChoudharyIshita Ayan Dutta New Delhi/Kolkata
2 min read Last Updated : Aug 20 2020 | 1:30 AM IST
JSW Steel’s Rs 19,700-crore bid to acquire Bhushan Power & Steel (BPSL) is again in trouble as the resolution professional (RP) of the latter has come under the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED’s) scanner. 

On Wednesday, the federal agency carried out an extensive search operation at four premises belonging to the RP and a former director of the debt-ridden steel company on allegations of certain irregularities. 

Confirming the development, an official said the three premises at Delhi and one at Gurugram have been covered so far in connection with the ongoing money laundering probe against the beleaguered steel firm.

The RP was unavailable for comment till the time of going to press.

Last year, the ED attached assets worth over Rs 4,000 crore of BPSL for an alleged bank loan fraud by the company’s former owners. 


The BPSL case is in the final leg of hearing in the Supreme Court. The ED had filed an appeal against a National Company Law Appellate Tribunal order that ordered the agency to release assets of BPSL attached under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

The attachment order came about seven months after JSW Steel was declared a successful resolution applicant for the debt-laden BPSL. 

JSW Steel was seeking immunity under Section 32A of the insolvency law, which provides immunity to the corporate debtor. However, the ED was objecting to the applicability of Section 32A of the insolvency law to the JSW-Bhushan deal on two counts. 

Primarily, JSW Steel’s resolution plan was approved by the National Company Law Tribunal in October 2019, prior to the introduction of Section 32A. Second, JSW Steel and BPSL are associates in the joint venture firm Rohne Coal Company, which disqualifies the resolution applicant from the purview of Section 32A, being a related party.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Enforcement DirectorateBhushan Power & Steel

Next Story