I-T dept moves SC against Turner International India

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 8:02 PM IST

The Income-Tax department has moved the Supreme Court against the decision of Turner International India to claim deduction against tax liability on account of losses due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations.

Raising the issue in a petition filed against Turner International India, the department submitted that the matter had wider ramifications as it would result in a loss of revenue to the state exchequer.

A bench headed by Justice S H Kapadia has kept the matter with a similar petition pending before it.

According to the department, it had asked Turner to explain as to whether losses were on the revenue or the capital account after it found that the company had claimed deduction against exchange rate fluctuation hits (on foreign loans) of more than Rs 1.68 crore in February 2004.

However, the tax department had disallowed the deduction claim, turning down Turner's plea that such losses were allowed as deduction as they were incurred in the ordinary course of business and were incidental to it.

Terming the assessee's plea as misleading, the I-T authorities held the company had made additions to fixed assets worth Rs 14.37 crore, which were largely from loans taken from foreign parties.

Citing the apex court's ruling in the Sutlej Cotton Mills case, the Revenue said that where the loss was incurred in respect of circulating capital, it was to be treated as revenue loss and where it was incurred in respect of fixed capital it was to be treated on the capital account.

Stating that the loss was in respect of fixed capital in Turner's case, the petition said: "... Under the mercantile system of accounting, liability can be allowed only when liability was repaid or which had been crystallised/ ascertained. The liability debited by Turner was merely a notional liability."

However, both the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeal) and the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal had upheld Turner's position that the liability in this matter was on the revenue account and thus deduction can be allowed.

The Delhi High Court had also endorsed the tribunal's position.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 03 2009 | 2:34 PM IST

Next Story