No Tata CEO spoke ill of Cyrus Mistry, says Nirmalya Kumar

Kumar writes in his blog that only lawyers and PR firms gained from Tata-Mistry war; the board could have just let the clock run out in five months

File photo of former Tata Group Chairman Cyrus Mistry attending the "Vibrant Gujarat Summit" at Gandhinagar.
BS Reporter Mumbai
2 min read Last Updated : Jan 02 2020 | 9:20 PM IST
Nirmalya Kumar, a close aide to former Tata group chairman Cyrus Mistry said only law firms and public relations (PR) companies gained from the Tata-Mistry war, while the reputation of the Tata group, as well as Cyrus Mistry, was damaged considerably.
 
Writing in his blog, Kumar, who was head of strategy of the Tata group during Mistry's tenure and removed the same day as Mistry, said no Tata group CEO, barring two – Harish Bhat and Bhaskar Bhat –spoke any ill of Mistry in the past year. This showed the goodwill the former chairman enjoyed, he claimed.

ALSO READ: How Nirmalya Kumar got fired from Tata Sons along with Cyrus Mistry
 
“By eschewing the public humiliation of Cyrus Mistry, the bloody aftermath that followed could have been avoided. Unfortunately, instead, there was the subsequent public airing of the underbelly of the Tata group as well as the deleterious impact on the reputations of Ratan Tata, Cyrus Mistry and the Tata brand. The only winners as far as one could see were the public relations companies and lawyers, who are still having a field day.”
 
Mistry was sacked on October 24, 2016 as Tata Sons chairman. Kumar’s blog chronicles the events of the day and those that followed subsequently, including disbanding of the group executive council, of which Mistry was a member.
 
Kumar said the initial contract under which Mistry was serving as the chairman had been passed through a shareholder resolution of Tata Sons. It was due to expire on March 31, 2017. “Instead of the sudden, no-warning dismissal, the board could have just let the clock run out in five months,” Kumar said.
 
“Despite the best efforts of the press, promoted by the six PR agencies, and pressure from the internal Tata communications team, only two Tata CEOs, Bhaskar Bhat and Harish Bhat, have had anything negative to say about Cyrus Mistry in the press. And, even they, were remarkably muted in their criticism. Under the circumstances, what better performance review could Cyrus Mistry have received as Chairman of Tata Sons,” wrote Kumar.

ALSO READ: How Cyrus Mistry was Fired as Tata Chairman

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Tata vs Mistry

Next Story