SC ruling creates stir in sports broadcasting

Experts believe the ruling may eventually have a commercial impact

SC ruling creates stir in sports broadcasting
Urvi Malvania Mumbai
Last Updated : May 28 2016 | 10:06 PM IST
The Supreme Court's turning down STAR India's plea against sharing live feeds of sporting events with Prasar Bharati sans advertisements comes as a disappointment to the sports broadcast industry. Experts believe the ruling may eventually have a commercial impact.

Earlier, STAR Sports had moved the apex court against the Delhi High Court's October 3, 2013 judgment that had not accepted ESPN Software Pvt Ltd's plea against Prasar Bharat seeking clean feed of sporting events of national importance.

The verdict comes as a setback to STAR Sports as it will have to take out all advertisements, including sponsor logos and on-screen credits before sharing the feeds with Prasar Bharati.

A media planner involved with sports broadcasting and sponsorships cautions that there is the issue of interpretation of the verdict. "My understanding is that it applies to TV sponsors roped in for various events by broadcasters. This cannot possibly apply to on-ground sponsors since it may not come under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. For example, in case of the Olympics, an on-ground sponsor has the deal with the global governing body of the Olympics and not with the Indian media rights holder. Similarly for ICC events, the on-ground sponsors cannot be expected to be 'cleaned' from a television feed," he says on the condition of annonymity.

Harish Thawani, chairman, Neo Sports, believes that the ramifications of the ruling will go beyond the broadcasters. "From what I have read in the media, the ruling will have an impact on the event owners as well. For one, the contracts for media rights and sponsorships (in some cases) have been signed a while back and the practice will have to be implemented now. So for an ICC event, Star may tell ICC that it cannot carry the logo of a commercial partner (of ICC) citing it is the law of the land. While Star will be correct in doing so, the commercial partner will want its money's worth and will take up the matter with the ICC. A lot needs to be clarified in the matter I feel. Also, what happens in cases where the on-air and on-ground rights are sold as a package?," he says.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 28 2016 | 10:03 PM IST

Next Story