“TERI is not okay with the demand for free power raised by the state government. It has instead suggested availability of power at a subsidised rate but the quantum has not been specified,” said a source at the energy department.
The Planning Commission had urged TERI to conduct a study on the issue after Odisha and some other coal bearing states pitched for free power from coal-based power plants coming up in their respective states.
It may be noted that Odisha had demanded 25 per cent free power from coal-based power plants and 33 per cent free power from power plants based on coal washery rejects.
Later, the state government is understood to have scaled down its power demand from plants based on washery rejects to 13 per cent in line with the provision under National Hydro Policy.
The demand was also stiffly opposed by the independent power producers (IPPs) who argued that the condition of supply of free power will make the power projects unviable.
A team of TERI had recently visited Odisha for a study on equitable sharing of benefits arising from coal mining and power generation amongst resource rich states. The objective of the study was also to examine the impact of allowing free power at variable cost from coal based plants in the host state.
TERI has sought information from the state government on various facets of the power sector like capacity of coal-based power plants, state share of power from these units, cess (if any) levied on the generators, current rate of electricity duty on consumption and tariff at which electricity is supplied from the power plants.
Earlier, the state energy department had sought the intervention of the Planning Commission for a quick decision on demand for free power by coal rich states.
Justifying its demand, the Odisha government had pointed out that while states consuming the power and coal from the host state get benefited, the host state gets a nominal advantage of limited employment opportunity and also a very low royalty on coal.
Both coal mining and power generation being in the manufacturing sector, hardly any ancillary industry gets developed around these activities. The above situation leads to an inequitable sharing of cost and benefits from coal mining and power generation.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)