Banks union threatens strike against RBI Internal Working Group proposals

Says depositors lose their savings, wonders whether it is prudent to allow both the lender and the borrower to be owned by the same set of people

Bank strike
Venkatachalam alleged that many private banks owned and controlled by corporates and big business houses were mismanaged and failed. Photo: PTI
T E Narasimhan Chennai
2 min read Last Updated : Nov 24 2020 | 8:18 PM IST
All India Bank Employees Union (AIBEA) has opposed the recommendations made by the RBI Internal Working Group. The recommendations call for allowing large corporate and industrial houses to promote banks and permitting promoters to raise their stakes in the bank’s equity share capital from 15 per cent to 26 per cent. They also called for allowing the conversion of large Non-Banking Finance Companies owned by the Corporate Houses into full-fledged Banks and payment banks into Small Finance Banks.

C H Venkatachalam, General Secretary, AIBDA said all these suggestions and recommendations are retrograde and unwarranted in Indian conditions.  

"Our Banks represent Rs 135 trillion of people’s money. RBI is supposed to be the repository of the people’s faith in the banking system but unfortunately, RBI itself is suggesting measures that will endanger the safety of people’s money in the Banks," he said.


Venkatachalam alleged that many private banks owned and controlled by corporates and big business houses were mismanaged and failed, and innocent people lost their precious savings. He said scams were reported in the past where bank owners became the borrowers too and looted public money. In the past, many banks controlled by Corporates were catering only to the affluent and common people had no access to banking services.

Venkatachalam added that in the past, when the Government wanted the private banks to participate in the country’s economic development, those ‘patriotic bank owners’ refused to contribute. He also asserted that it is the big corporate and business houses who are the major defaulters, and wondered whether it was prudent to allow corporate houses to own and control banks. "Can anyone agree that the lender (bank) and borrower (corporate house) should be owned by the same people and that it will not lead to conflict of interest and affect good governance," he asked.

"If the Government and the RBI try to allow corporate houses to take over Banks, AIBEA will unleash countrywide agitation and organize repeated strikes," said Venkatachalam, asking the Government to reject these proposals.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :RBIBanksBank UnionBank unions' strike

Next Story