OPS adoption may benefit current generation at cost of future generations

Pension payments as a percentage of revenue receipts of states increased from 2 per cent in 1980-81 to 11 per cent in 1999-2000

Pension
When employees who joined after the implementation of NPS begin to retire from 2034 onwards, the costs of reverting to OPS will become more visible
Aditi Phadnis
2 min read Last Updated : Dec 18 2022 | 10:47 PM IST
Several states, including Himachal Pradesh, which held elections recently, have announced their decision to bring back the old pension scheme (OPS). 

Pension reforms were implemented about two decades ago to reduce the burden on the finances of central and state governments. By reverting to OPS, states may reduce their pension expenditure in the near term, but will incur higher pension expenditure in the longer run.

In 2000, the Project Old Age Social and Income Security report observed that higher government spending on old age security had often been at the cost of spending on other important public goods.

The Report of the Group to Study the Pension Liabilities of State Governments (2003) noted that the continuation of the existing pension (defined benefit) scheme without any modification would be unsustainable and deteriorate states’ financial position.

Pension payments as a percentage of revenue receipts of states increased from 2 per cent in 1980-81 to 11 per cent in 1999-2000.

The architecture of government pensions in India changed with the implementation of the National Pension System (NPS). This scheme was made mandatory for all central government employees (except the Armed Forces) joining from January 1, 2004.

NPS changed the principle of pensions from a defined benefit scheme to a defined contribution scheme. 

Under NPS, employees contribute a certain amount from their monthly emoluments (usually 10 per cent) in a pension corpus. A contribution is also deposited by the government in the corpus.

Given that the current retirees from state governments are primarily the beneficiaries of OPS, the immediate financial strain will not be felt if states choose to implement it.

However, when employees who joined after the implementation of NPS begin to retire from 2034 onwards, the costs of reverting to OPS will become more visible. 

Adoption of OPS is expected to benefit the current generation at the cost of future generations.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Pensionspension schemesGovernment pension

Next Story