Can't order establishment of 'Ram Rajya' in the country: SC

The bench was hearing a plea on the problem of encroachments on roads and footpaths across the country

Can't order establishment of 'Ram Rajya' in the country: SC
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 26 2016 | 5:47 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Friday said it cannot order the establishment of 'Ram Rajya' in the country and it cannot do several things it wanted to due to its "limited capacity".

"Do you think with our directions, everything will be done? Do you (petitioner) think we will pass an order that there will be no corruption in the country and all corruption will go? Should we pass an order that there will be 'Ram Rajya' in the country? It cannot be like this," a bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur said.

The bench was hearing a plea on the problem of encroachments on roads and footpaths across the country.

"We want to do various things but we cannot do. Our capacity to do things is limited. This is a problem," the bench, also comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, said.

The apex court's observation came when the petitioner, an NGO, urged the bench not to dismiss its plea asking "if this court does not take any action or pass any direction, then who will."

The petitioner told the court that there were encroachments on footpaths and roads not only in Delhi but in the entire country.

During the hearing, the bench said it would dismiss the plea and told the petitioner, "we cannot go by an assumption that everything in the country is wrong."

When the bench asked the petitioner to approach the high court first, he said, "how many high courts will I go... This court should hear this matter" and added "where is the rule of law in the country? I have come here with so much hope."

The petitioner also said that in 2014, the apex court had asked the concerned authorities to deal with this issue on his plea.

When the petitioner told the bench that there was rampant encroachment on the roads and footpaths across the country and authorities were doing nothing, the bench said, "You can educate the people about this."

The bench, which had earlier said it would dismiss the plea, later posted it for hearing in February next year.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 26 2016 | 4:42 PM IST

Next Story