The Supreme Court Friday wondered if it could stop people from making provocative or derogatory speeches, pointing out that there were laws to deal with people making inflammatory speeches.
"How can we stop people from making derogatory speeches? How can it be enforced?" asked a bench of Justice B.S.Chauhan and Justice S.A. Bobde while hearing a petition seeking guidelines to curb elected representatives, political and religious leaders from delivering hate speeches in pursuance of their narrow political goals.
The court asked the petitioner - NGO Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan - to place before it the copies complaints about the people who have allegedly made hate speeches. The court gave time to the NGO to get the copies of the complaints and place before it as it adjourned the hearing.
The court had April 29 given time to the central government and the Election Commission to place before it their suggestions with regards to the guidelines sought by the NGO. By its order then, the court had also issued notice to the states as the issue came under the domain too.
The court had earlier observed that the "civil society too had a role in curbing such tendencies."
Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan, in its petition, contended that numerous hate and derogatory speeches made by the elected representatives, political and religious leaders on caste, religion, region and ethnic lines were violative of the Constitution's Articles 14 (Equality before law), 15 (Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste or place of birth), 16 (Equality in matter of public appointments) 19 (Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech) and 21 (Protection of life and liberty) read with the Directive Principles of State Policy.
Citing the hate speeches by the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray, Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen leader Akbaruddin Owaisi, and Vishwa Hindu Parishad's international working president Praveen Togadia, the NGO said the utterances of these leaders were destroying the fabtric of democracy, unity and integrity of the country.
"It is very important to have guidelines to curb hate speeches as they are targeted against the citizens particularly the migrant workers," it noted.
The NGO has urged the court to declare that "fraternity" in the preamble of the constitution formed part of the "basic structure" of the Constitution.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)