Delhi HC reverses order on 'Prius' brand name in Toyota trademark case

The July 8 verdict had found Prius Auto guilty of infringing on Toyota's goodwill and reputation

Toyota
Visitors walk past a logo of Toyota Motor Corp on a Toyota Prius hybrid vehicle at the company's showroom in Tokyo. Photo: Reuters
Sayan Ghosal New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 24 2016 | 12:11 PM IST
A division bench of the Delhi High Court on Friday reversed a July 8 verdict by a single judge restraining Prius Auto Industries, a Delhi-based an automotive accessories company, from using the 'Prius' trademark for its products after upholding a challenge earlier made by Japanese car maker Toyota Motor Corp.

The July 8 verdict had found Prius Auto guilty of infringing on Toyota's goodwill and reputation, by selling car spare parts under the name 'Prius', a trade name for Toyota's hybrid vehicles and thereby gaining customers who were familiar with Toyota's reputation. The judgment restrained the Prius Auto from manufacturing, selling, or using the trademarks "Prius", "Toyota" and "Innova". In addition, the court had also directed Prius Auto to pay Rs 10 lakh to Toyota as compensation for the infringement.

After the single judge determination, Prius Auto had challenged the interpretation of well-known trademarks, taken by Toyota to secure the judgment and had submitted before the division bench that such trademarks had to be determined in context to a similar class of goods and in a relevant geographical market.

Accepting Prius Auto's arguments, the division bench headed by Justice Pradeep Nandrajog on Friday, held that the single judge interpretation determining Toyota's trans-border reputation on the 'Prius' brand had been established solely through passing references in newspapers, which in themselves could not be said to decisively prove the automatic recognition of the mark in favour of Toyota in India.

The bench also highlighted that the fact that Prius Auto was in the business of manufacturing auto parts since 2001, and no such complaint had been made until the year 2010, itself proved that the use of the 'Prius' brand name did not create confusion in the minds of buyers.

Considering that the nature of goods sold, class of buyers and trade channels were completely different from Toyota's hybrid cars, the bench set aside the order of the single judge and allowed the auto part manufacturer to continue using the 'Prius' brand name for its products. The court however, still upheld the portion of the earlier order that restrains Prius Auto from referring to any of its goods under the 'Toyota' or 'Innova' trade names.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 24 2016 | 1:46 AM IST

Next Story