Do not give nod to Maharashtra Police Bill, activists urge Guv

The Bill, passed by both Houses of the state Legislature on June 14 this year, is aimed at giving the citizens of Maharashtra a capable, well managed and accountable police

Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jun 30 2014 | 3:55 PM IST
A delegation of citizen activists, led by former Mumbai Police Commissioner J F Ribeiro, today met Governor K Sankaranarayanan urging him not to give assent to Maharashtra Police (Amendment) Bill 2014, alleging it "was passed in haste without due consideration."

The Bill, passed by both Houses of the state Legislature on June 14 this year, is aimed at giving the citizens of Maharashtra a capable, well managed and accountable police.

"The Governor listened to us patiently. He said that due considerations will be given to the discussion we had with him. We have only been trying to press on him to use his powers under Article 200 of the Constitution to withhold his assent to this extremely bad Bill," Maja Daruwala, director of Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), told PTI.

The Bill is entirely against the directives of the Supreme Court to the state, she said, adding that a bad law will bring about bad policing.

Dolphy D'Souza, convener of Police Reforms Watch in Maharashtra, said the Bill formalises the very practices of unwarranted political interference with everyday police management that the Supreme Court has sought to reduce. Hence, it must be overhauled to be made fit for purpose.

CHRI and Police Reforms Watch, the NGOs working on police reforms and accountability, had last week written the Governor, urging him to invoke his powers under Article 200 of the Constitution to withhold his assent to the Bill.

They requested him to send the Bill back to the state Legislature for reconsideration, and send recommended changes for both Houses to consider.

Maharashtra Police (Amendment) Bill, 2014, passed by the Assembly, is to replace an ordinance which made amendments to the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, to set the state on the path of police reforms. It is meant to incorporate the directives of the Supreme Court on police reforms.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 30 2014 | 3:41 PM IST

Next Story