Govt not empowered to issue orders to block accounts: Twitter to HC

Council for microblogging site emphasises that Section 69A (power to intercept electronic communication) of IT Act does not spell out mass blocking of accounts

Twitter
Photo: Bloomberg
Bhavini Mishra New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Oct 17 2022 | 7:34 PM IST
Twitter on Monday told the Karnataka High Court that the Central Government was not empowered to issue general orders to block social media accounts unless the nature of the contents satisfied the grounds of Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

The section talks about the power of the Central government to issue directions for blocking public access to any information through any computer resource if the government believes it goes against the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India or other reasons mentioned in this section. However, the reasons for blocking such information must be recorded in writing by the government.

“There can’t be general blocking orders unless the content violates the grounds under 69A,” Advocate Arvind Datar, appearing for Twitter, told Justice Krishna S Dixit.

In the previous hearing, Datar told the court that 10 blocking orders were issued by the central government between February 2021 and the same month this year, to block accounts during the farmers’ stir in and around Delhi. He emphasised that Section 69A (power to intercept electronic communication) of the Information Technology Act does not spell out the mass blocking of accounts.

Twitter further said while Indian laws allow the blocking of tweets but to block entire accounts simply based on political criticism may go against the heart of the freedom of speech and expression and the right to criticise the government.

The court had also asked Datar to compile data about how other countries around the world may have dealt with a similar issue.

Giving an example of Australia, he said the time limit for blocking orders in the country was three months but there was no such limit in India.

“All jurisdictions recognise that intermediaries were also aggrieved persons when blocking orders were passed by the government,” he said.

Meanwhile, Senior Advocate Ashok Haranahalli, also appearing for Twitter, said that not disclosing reasons to users for blocking their content or accounts goes against the right to freedom of expression.

Twitter has challenged the blocking of only 39 URLs out of 1,474 accounts and 175 tweets.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Twittercentral governmentIT actSocial MediaSocial media appsKarnatakaHigh CourtDelhi High CourtGovernmentinformation technologyInformation Technology Act

Next Story