Bombay HC sets aside ban on Maggi noodles
Orders fresh testing of noodles at 3 independant labs; Maggi to be available at retail outlets only if tests satisfactory
 "Bombay HC sets aside ban on Maggi noodles")
In a major relief to Maggi noodles manufacturer Nestle India, the Bombay High Court today quashed the orders of Indian food regulators that banned nine variants of noodles in the country.
A division bench of the High Court allowed Nestle to go in for fresh testing by sending five samples of each variant to three independent laboratories in Punjab, Hyderabad and Jaipur, which were accredited with National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL).
These samples would be taken out of the 750 samples preserved by the company following the ban. A huge stock of Maggi noodles was destroyed by Nestle after the ban was imposed by the food regulators.
Read more from our special coverage on "NESTLE MAGGI CONTROVERSY"
If the lead content is found below permissible limits by these three labs, Nestle, the Indian arm of Swiss company, will be allowed to manufacture Maggi noodles, Justices V M Kanade and B P Colabawala said.
The labs have been asked to submit their report within six weeks.
While quashing the orders of the food regulators, namely Food Safety Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and Maharashtra's Food and Drugs Department (FDA), the court said that principles of natural justice were not followed because the manufacturer was not given a hearing.
Moreover, the laboratories, where tests were performed to determine lead content in Maggi, were not authorised, the court observed.
The judges refused to grant stay on their order on a plea made by food regulators. They said the company had given an undertaking that it would not manufacture or sell Maggi noodles till the results of the three labs were received.
"The fresh tests would also take some time. Hence, there was no need to grant a stay on the order," the judges said.
The HC held that the petitions filed by Nestle challenging the nation-wide ban on Maggi noodles was maintainable and that it (the high court) had the jurisdiction to hear it under powers derived by it under Article 226 of the Constitution.
FSSAI and FDA had earlier banned Maggi noodles saying the samples of noodles tested by them contained 'lead beyond permissible limit'.
Nestle had argued that its product did not contain 'lead' in excess of permissible ceiling and challenged the tests by FSSAI and FDA.