SC asks HC to decide afresh contempt plea of ED officer

A contempt plea was filed for allegedly misleading the trial court by giving false information

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 01 2013 | 12:13 PM IST
The Supreme Court has asked the Delhi High Court to decide afresh a contempt plea filed by an Enforcement Directorate officer against a former city police commissioner and others for allegedly levelling false charges against him, which resulted in him spending 36 days in jail.

The apex court said the high court had not dealt with all the relevant facts of the case while dismissing the contempt plea of Ashok Kumar Aggarwal against former Police Commissioner Neeraj Kumar and asked it to decide afresh.

"We are of the considered opinion that as both the parties had raised issues on facts as well as on law, the High Court ought to have dealt with the case adverting to all relevant issues, particularly when the appellant (Aggarwal) had made an allegation that his liberty had been jeopardised by the respondents by interfering with the course of justice by misleading the court," a bench headed by Justice B S Chauhan said.

"As a result, we set aside the judgement and order impugned and remit the case to the High Court to decide afresh answering all the factual and legal issues raised by the parties," it said.

Aggarwal had submitted that the investigating officer had suppressed material fact from the court due to which he faced 36 days judicial custody in jail.

The apex court, in a separate judgement, ordered withdrawal of the disciplinary action against Aggarwal, who was suspended 13 years ago.

A contempt plea was filed for allegedly misleading the trial court by giving false information.

Aggarwal was arrested on the suspicion that he was having two passports and he had visited Singapore between February 10-14, 1999. His visit was also confirmed by Interpol Singapore on queries from the Indian authorities, but later, Interpol Singapore said the information it furnished earlier was factually incorrect.

A complaint was filed against Aggarwal by a Delhi-based businessman alleging that he was being implicated in a case by forging documents. A lookout notice was issued against him through Interpol as he was absconding. He was arrested on December 23, 1999, from Saharanpur where he was staying in a hotel under a fictitious name.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 01 2013 | 9:30 AM IST

Next Story