Seeking action against RBI officials, including Governor Raghuram Rajan, the Rajya Sabha MP alleged that the 10 entities that were granted 'in-principle approval' by the Reserve Bank despite their lacking the eligibility criteria as set out in the central bank's guidelines including about foreign holding.
Swamy, who had earlier written to the Prime Minister seeking dismissal of Rajan for failing to lower interest rates and boost the economy, said that RBI has "failed to perform the duty diligently" in grant of these approvals and there seemed to be "on the face of it, a malafide negligence".
He also sought to link the grant of the licences to possible money laundering of funds belonging to politicians and bureaucrats "friendly" to a former Finance Minister who still "dominate" high posts in the ministry.
Swamy has said that the 10 licences granted in private sector to small finance banks do not fulfil the criterion laid down by RBI "which confirms the malice in the RBI decision".
The BJP MP said the guidelines for grant of licences were "brazenly flouted" in granting approval and hence was not in public interest.
"Therefore, these illegal approvals attract Section l3(1)(d)(iii) of the Prevention of Corruption, Act (1988). The present Governor of RBI is thus answerable in a probe into this matter," he said in his letter to the Prime Minister.
"You may therefore consider a probe by the CBI-led SIT (Special Investigation Team), and have RBI officials including the Governor of RBI interrogated for this scam," Swamy wrote.
In his letter he also alleged that it is clearly made out from the Annual Reports of 10 shortlisted applicants that each is either an NBFC, Micro Finance Institution or a Local Area Bank and "not even a single company of shortlisted applicants fulfils all the criteria laid down in the guidelines for SFB which confirms malice in the RBI decision".
Swamy also said that looking into the credentials of successful applicants, it is apparent that most of these applicants' foreign holdings are contrary to the criteria as set out by RBI for Small Finance Banks.
"Most of successful applicants are in fact controlled by foreign entities," he alleged, adding that most of the successful applicants are funded or supported by common foreign entities run by "a specific community".
Swamy has also alleged that in order to benefit NBFCs and MFLs certain guidelines were created providing exception to them and dubbed them as "mala fide".
"Five years for promoters which would be assessed by the RBI as 'fit and proper' are set against no experience eligibility for NBFCs, MFIs and LABs indicates an interest of benefiting these entities," he said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)