A lot of unutilised space in insurance sector for foreign investment

There is headroom for foreign partners in both the life and non-life sectors within the current limits

FDIs, foreign investment, insurance
Subhomoy Bhattacharjee New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Mar 02 2020 | 1:24 AM IST
The stagnant share of foreign investment in insurance companies has prompted the government to defer raising the limit in the sector to 74 per cent from 49 per cent now.

As the table shows, there is headroom for foreign partners in both the life and non-life sectors within the current limits. This is the list shared by the sector regulator, the Insurance Regulatory Authority of India (IRDAI), with the finance ministry before the Budget.

Both the finance ministry and IRDAI had talks on this with the companies in the run up to Budget 2020-21.

“We did get representations to raise the limit, but the data does not support those,” said a senior official of the sector. There have also been strong representations from US business interests supporting the move to raise the insurance foreign investment limit. 

After the Budget made no mention of it, the influential US-India Strategic Partnership Forum expressed disappointment.


Speaking at a recent event on the India-USA trade dialogue, Sanjay Chadha, additional secretary, ministry of commerce, said raising the foreign investment limit was a key issue of difference between New Delhi and Washington DC.

As of March last year, in the life insurance sector, for instance, against the 49 per cent limit of permissible foreign investment, the aggregate foreign investment is 35.49 per cent. 

It is almost unchanged from what it was a year ago. Of the 23 private sector companies in the sector, 12 have space for more investment in the sector. This includes leaders like Bajaj Allianz Life, HDFC Life, and ICICI Prudential.

In the case of general, reinsurance, and standalone health insurance companies the utilisation percentage of the space for foreign investment is worse. The aggregate space for foreign investment has been utilised to less than half the permissible limit. It has gone down from the level of March 2018, when it was 25.42 per cent, to 23.66 per cent. 

Again, a perusal of the list of the 28 private-sector companies shows only six have used up their limit of 49 per cent. These are Max Bupa, Cigna, and Aditya Birla among health insurers and Bharti Axa, Iffco-Tokio and Raheja QBE.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Insurance companiesForeign investmentsInsurance SectorIRDAI

Next Story