To address the issue of dual control of traders - by both the Union government and state governments - in GST, it has been decided that taxpayers with annual turnover of over Rs 1.5 crore would be taxed by the Centre, which will later disburse to states their share. Similarly, those below Rs 1.5-crore turnover would deposit their taxes to states, which would subsequently pass on to the Centre its share.
Also, there would be a composition scheme (presumptive tax) for dealers with annual turnover of up to Rs 60 lakh. A dealer could opt for a compounded levy of one per cent on taxable turnover, instead of paying GST at the standard rate; but he would lose the right to claim tax credit for these.
These decisions were taken last week in Patna by a technical committee on GST, comprising officials from both the Centre and states. The group, which will have its third meeting next week, will give its report for consideration of the empowered committee of state finance ministers at its meeting in Mussoorie on May 10 and 11.
Currently, the threshold for central excise duty and service tax are annual turnover of Rs 1.5 crore and Rs 10 lakh, respectively. For value-added tax (VAT), it is Rs 10 lakh in most states.
With a threshold of Rs 25 lakh, the Centre will have an assessee base of about 200,000 for excise duty, compared with 130,000 at present. Its service tax assessee base, however, would come down from about 700,000 to roughly 250,000 under GST as the threshold increases and the Centre has to share the collections with states. In return, the Centre would get tax from about two million of the three million VAT assessees.
Earlier, states were insisting on retaining the threshold at Rs 1.5 crore for the Centre and at Rs 10 lakh for states, but the Centre wanted a common threshold of Rs 10 lakh.
For inter-state movement of goods, which would attract Integrated GST (IGST), no threshold has been proposed; anybody moving goods from one state to another would have to pay the tax. An exception in case of IGST is that the traders might have to face dual control. It is still to be decided as to who would collect tax in case of IGST.
"For inter-state movement of goods, it would be difficult to decide which state should collect the tax," an official who attended the meeting told Business Standard.
A floor rate of 9-10 per cent for standard goods with a band of two percentage points, a lower merit rate of four-five per cent, a rate of one per cent for precious metals and service tax rate of eight per cent have also been discussed at the two previous meetings of the committee on revenue-neutral rate (RNR). A small group has been formed to finalise RNR. The third meeting of the committee is scheduled next week.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)