Army Presence In J & K May Not Be Reduced

Image
Faizal Ahmad BSCAL
Last Updated : Aug 29 1997 | 12:00 AM IST

Given the current level of violence and the desperate attempts from across the border to push in as many militants as possible before the passes get closed with the first snow fall, it is not possible to reduce the role of the Army in anti-insurgency operations in the Valley for atleast another year.

This has emerged as a consensus at the level of formation commanders of the Army who were recently asked to comment on whether or not the role of the various units of the army deployed on counter-insurgency operations here can be `marginalised.

There are reports here that the State government headed by Dr Farooq Abdullah is coming under severe pressure from within and outside to reduce the role of the Army in controlling militancy. Insiders here suggest that some of the senior cabinet colleagues of Dr Abdullah have been voicing their `apprehensions that our government is functioning under the canopy of the Army and as to how long can things be allowed to continue like that.

`We do not want to suffer casualties and remain detailed on anti-insurgency duties for even a day more than it is absolutely necessary, says a senior Army officer who also accepts that infiltration from across the border `has been going on during this year. What worries the senior officers of the army is that `more and more foreign element is being introduced into insurgency by Pakistan.

To prove this point, a general office commanding (GOC) says, We killed just two foreigners in 1991 while during last eight months alone this year we have killed over one hundred of them indifferent encounters. The Army does not deny the fact that in addition to Gurez, Telial, Jawdoor and Kupwara in the valley, there has been infiltration in Poonch, Rajouri sectors of the Jammu division as well this year.

The recent `letter controversy between the Union Home Minister and Dr Farooq Abdullah on the role of the central forces in J&K and allegations of rights violations against them, seems to have `triggered off quite a bit of debate at the command headquarters about `the thankless job in which the Army is involved here.

Dr Abdullah, while replying queries from the Union Home Minister had said in his communication `that since the Army, the Border Security Force and the Central Reserve Police Force do not come under the administrative control of the state government, a separate mechanism should be devised to probe allegations of human rights violations against them.

While there is appreciable improvement in the overall situation here, the thinking that the Army could be sent back to the barracks `shall have to await for atleast one more year according to experts here.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 29 1997 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story