Cannot take coercive action in circular trading cases: Bombay HC

The petitioner, whose business is in dealing with MS ingots, had filed a plea in court for personal liberty enshrined in the constitution

GST
Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Mar 21 2019 | 12:39 AM IST
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday ruled that no coercive action will be taken against a person charged with issuing fake invoices and circular trading, pending final order.

The ad interim order came amid many cases of arrests over the allegations of circular trading, which experts said could instil fear among the business community.

The petitioner, whose business is in dealing with MS ingots, had filed a plea in court for personal liberty enshrined in the constitution.

Abhishek Rastogi, counsel for the petitioner, contended that the GST officials are not following procedures while dealing with those charged with fake invoices and circular trading. 

He had argued that he procured metallic scrap from vendors for manufacturing products and that all transactions were genuine and there was no case of circular trading or fake invoice. Only a particular variety of scrap is used in the process. In case scrap does not meet the requirement, it is sold with the by-product that arises from the smelting process, technically known as Runner Riser.

Besides ordering against coercion, the court ruled that a lawyer be allowed to accompany the person during questioning by GST authorities. Authorities were asked to video record the proceedings.

It also directed authorities to follow procedures such as filing of first information report, while arresting the person.

There are cases of arrests in cases of circular trading, which experts said lack procedures required to be followed.  

“There have been cases when the proceedings initiated by the authorities lack procedural irregularities and there is a clear threat of the offence falling within the category of non-bailable and cognizable offence,” he said. 

Circular trading refers to issuing of invoices in transactions among multiple companies without actual supply of goods. This is done to use input tax credit in the GST regime.     

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story