Employees Can Opt Out Of Vrs Before Acceptance

Image
BUSINESS STANDARD
Last Updated : Jan 28 2013 | 12:40 AM IST

An employee who chooses to accept the voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) can opt out of it before it is accepted, the Supreme Court ruled last week.

In this case, involving an employee of Project & Development India Ltd, the court asked the company to pay the full salary and allowance for the entire period when he was out of service because of the rejection of his plea to remain in the job.

The Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the Patna High Court which had held otherwise.

Also Read

The employee had applied for the VRS on October 18, 1995, which was accepted by the management on July 30, 1997 with the condition that the release memo with details would follow.

On August 7, 1997, the employee sent a letter withdrawing his option from the VRS by registered post, but the company did not reply. Two reminders were sent, but the company again did not respond.

After some time, the company released him with effect from September 26, 1997. He moved the high court against the release order, which was dismissed.

Allowing his appeal, the Bench, comprising Justice S N Phukan and Justice P Venkatarama Reddi, explained that the letter of acceptance was a conditional one inasmuch as though the option for the VRS was accepted, it was stated that the release memo would be issued later.

Before he was actually released from service, he had withdrawn his option by sending two letters, but there was no response. He was paid his salary till the date of actual release on September 26.

Therefore, the legal relationship of the employee and the employer between them did not end on the date of acceptance of the voluntary retirement and the relationship continued till September 26.

Therefore, the company could not have refused to accept the resignation because it was sent before the legal relationship between them came to an end.

The judgment cited an earlier decision of the Supreme Court in the Power Finance Corporation Ltd vs Pramod Kumar case (1997), in which it was held that unless the employee is relieved of the duty, after acceptance of the offer of voluntary retirement or resignation, jural relationship of the employee and the employer does not come to an end.

It was pointed out in that case that the acceptance of voluntary retirement was not unconditional. Before the conditions could be complied with, the employee could withdraw from the scheme. The present judgment further emphasised that a prospective resignation could be withdrawn at any time before it became effective.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 18 2002 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story