Environment Ministry not to be rigid on coal mining projects

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 2:34 AM IST

The Environment Ministry has agreed to "discuss" the coal projects on a "case-by-case basis", as it does not want to be seen as a spoilsport in industrial development through contentious 'go' and 'no go' mining policy, sources said.

The issue came up for discussion at the meeting of the Group of Ministers (GoM), headed by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee which has been trying to resolve differences between the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF)on the one hand and ministries of coal, steel and power on the other, since February.

The differences mainly relate to the the MoEF treating some forest areas as 'no go' for coal mining.

Sources said the MoEF pointed out at the GoM meeting that "if you (the coal ministry) have specific projects, you bring them to us and we will discuss the same...On the case to case basis".

While the MoEF does not want to be seen as rigid in its stand, the ministry is not willing either to foresake environment protection completely, sources said.

Earlier, a high level Committee, headed by Planning Commission Member B K Chaturvedi had recommended that the MoEF policy of 'go' and 'no go' for allowing or disallowing coal mines has no legal basis in the Forest Conservation Act,1980.

Talking to reporters after the GoM meeting, Coal Minister Sriprakash Jaiswal said,"There were issues raised by the Chaturvedi Committee which have almost been resolved."

Asked whether any decision was taken with regard eight specific coal blocks, which are stuck due to the MoEF strict guidelines, Jaiswal said,"we have not reached that stage (of specifics)".

These blocks belong to the Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group, Essar and the Aditya Birla Group.

A high level official source said that certain aspects would be looked into while considering the "case-by-case" coal-mining projects from the environment point of view. These include -whether the project is located in dense forests, or wildlife zones.

While the MoEF had put 203 coal blocks in 'no-go' mining areas, the Coal Ministry argued that potential coal production to the tune of approximately 660 million tonnes (MT) was affected due to the tough classification.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 20 2011 | 6:36 PM IST

Next Story