It warned however that “automatic” trickling down of bumper harvests to increase the economic activity may not be realised unless policymakers play the facilitator’s role well.
The farm sector had grown at 1.9 per cent last fiscal.
“Comparing these likely agri-GDP growth rates in 2013-14 agriculture year (July-June) with the 2012-13 performance, it turns out that agri-GDP growth is likely to be about three times higher than last year,” said a discussion paper co-authored by CACP chief Ashok Gulati.
The farm growth is expected to be in the range of 5.2-5.7 per cent this year because monsoon showers have been one of the best the country has experienced in the last two decades or so, it said.
Gulati, in his personal capacity, said in the discussion paper: “Farm growth is likely to come largely from oilseeds, pulses, cotton and coarse cereals belt of central and western parts of India, which is less irrigated and thereby more dependent on rains.”
The Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) is a statutory body under the Agriculture Ministry which advises the government on pricing policy for major farm commodities.
Noting that a higher agri-GDP growth is likely to boost the overall performance of the economy via its multiplier effect, the paper said, farm income may rise 15 per cent in nominal terms, triggering some increased demand for agri-inputs for durable and FMCG goods in rural areas.
However, the virtuous cycle of economic growth may just be a distant dream unless the necessary condition of increasing rural or farm incomes is realised, it said. Suggesting that the government prepare well for a big harvest, the paper said it should liquidate at least 20 million tonnes of foodgrains in the domestic market or for exports without compromising on the needs of Food law.
Clearing the excess stock for new crop will help contain food inflation and also save on high carrying costs of grains and thus reduce fiscal deficit, it said.
Second, the paper suggested de-listing of fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) Act and incentivise processors and modern retailers to buy directly from farmers. “This would compress their value chains benefiting both consumers and producers, saving on large wastage, and further bringing down food inflation,” the paper said, adding that once food inflation is down, subsidies on fuel and fertilisers can be cut more aggressively reducing fiscal deficit.
Third, the paper recommended that the government facilitate and create conducive international trade rules and policies so as to hedge farmers against falling domestic prices, because of increased supplies.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)