According to the Department of Industrial Promotion & Policy (DIPP), during the six-month period, foreign investment inflows showed a fluctuating trend. The highest foreign direct investment (FDI) received in January was $4.48 billion, compared to $2.18 billion in the same month a year ago. FDI inflows also grew in February to $3.28 billion compared to $2.01 billion. However, the month of March saw a dip and reached $2.11 billion against $3.53 billion in the same month a year ago.
Despite a series of foreign trips undertaken by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to most developed countries of the world, investments from these continued to remain sluggish.
During January-June 2015 - the latest period for which data is available - FDI from the US, Germany, Japan and France stood at $0.97 billion, 0.27 billion, $1.12 billion and $0.2, respectively, according to DIPP figures.
"The figure of $31 billion (as reported by Financial Times) looks unlikely as there has been no big-ticket investment this year in any of the significant sectors of manufacturing. Even in the sectors where the government has relaxed FDI norms such as defence, railways and insurance, nothing much happened. Manufacturing is yet to receive any substantial boost," said Madan Sabnavis, chief economist, CARE Ratings.
According to Sabnavis, India continues to remain an attractive destination for foreign inflows due to the sheer size of its market and the vast scope of investment into the infrastructure sector, which in other developing countries such as Hong Kong, Brazil and South Africa have saturated.
Sectors that saw the highest foreign capital inflows during January-June 2015 were telecommunications, auto and services.
FDI into these sectors stand at $3.67 billion (telecommunications), $2.08 billion (automobile industry) and $1.6 billion in services, which includes banking, insurance, outsourcing and logistics, among others.
According to Biswajit Dhar, professor of economics in Jawaharlal Nehru University, there is a difference between 'feelgood' factor and actual investments taking place. "The FDI inflows received in the calendar year were no doubt more than last year's, but these numbers do not contribute to economic growth or generation of jobs. Besides, there has been no change in the source of FDI. These inflows are not contributing to the growth dynamics." Interestingly, FDI inflows have reduced in some of the sectors during the January-June period compared to the same period last year.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)