According to the new rules, an assessee will need to submit an ‘authorisation’ to claim deduction in respect of a payment made to any financial institution located in a jurisdiction notified as non-cooperating. Therefore, people who have stashed their money in these countries might find it difficult to conceal it anymore.
Form 10FC has been prescribed for submitting the authorisation for waiving all protections provided under any law and allowing the tax department to obtain the information and records of the foreignaccounts. These include documents identifying the account holder, the beneficial owner, authorised persons, account opening documents, correspondence between the bank and the customer/beneficial owner or third parties in relation to the account, account statements, and statements of assets.
Such assessees will also have to maintain some additional documents such as description of the person they are dealing with in the blacklisted jurisdiction, including their name, address, location; a profile of the multinational group of which the specified person is a part, and a broad description of the business of the person and the industry he operates in.
“The information and documents will have to be kept and maintained for eight years from the end of the relevant assessment year,” said the Central Board of Direct Taxes in the notification.
According to officials, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Hong Kong, Singapore, Samoa, and Seychelles are some of the countries India has requested for information but they haven’t done so effectively. While the government might consider blacklisting a small country to send a signal, it would be difficult to take any action against important trading partners, such as the UAE, as it could spoil India’s relationship with them.
In Budget 2011-12, the finance ministry inserted Section 94A in the Income Tax Act to notify countries not cooperating in exchange of information. While the provision came into effect from June 2011, the government did not notify the rules as it wanted to use the provision as a threat .
Recently, India approached about half a dozen foreign jurisdictions, including Singapore, Samoa, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands and Cook Islands, for banking and other financial details of about 500 individuals and entities that might have ‘secret offshore accounts’ there. The names and listed addresses of 505 India-linked entities were made public after a global expose on secret offshore accounts by a US-based rights group, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)