As per the survey, the rural urban inequality (in the absence of reliable income data, the survey data on household expenditure acts as a gauge for may have equality) may have improved a tad as compared to the 66th round survey conducted during July 2009-June2010.
However, the improvement is only marginal and the disparity still remains high. As per the latest survey, average monthly household spending of the urban area (at Rs 2,630) is still 84 per cent higher than that of rural areas (Rs 1,430), while two years back, it was higher by 88 per cent. Moreover, the disparity within states is remarkable and it has actually increased in quite a few states, with the states of Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal and Karnataka being the most unequal, with average urban household expenditure being more than double that of rural areas. On the other hand, despite a slight increase in inequality, Kerala and Punjab remains the most equal state. (Click for chart)
The overall improvement in the rural urban divide can be attributed to increased spending in welfare schemes which leads to a higher level of transfer of income to the rural areas. And, with the richer and well-connected farmers being the major beneficiaries of such rural welfare schemes (especially the MSP), rural inequality (calculated as the ratio of the average household expenditure of the top 10 per cent of the population to the bottom 10 per cent of the population) has actually increased (from 4.56 times to 4.93 times), while urban inequality (though higher) has fallen a tad (from 8.78 times to 8.71 times).
However, what is shocking about the data is the sustained fall in household expenditure on food, despite despicably high incidences of hunger and malnourishment in India.
In fact, the share of expenditure on food as a proportion to total expenditure in the rural areas fell below 50 per cent for the first time, having declined by as much as five per cent in a period of two years - the highest ever decline. Given that food inflation in India remained inexorably high during this period, the drastic fall in food consumption is an area of concern. Also, the household budget seems to be squeezed due to increasing cost of health and education expenses, which might also force a cut in food expenditure.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)