Money-Laundering Bill To Put Onus Of Proof On Accused

Image
Ashutosh Kumar Sinha BSCAL
Last Updated : Mar 29 1997 | 12:00 AM IST

Under the proposed bill to curb money laundering, the onus to prove that unaccounted money was not acquired through sale of arms, drug peddling or other such illegal activities will be on the accused persons.

Official sources said this provision, similar to that found in the Prevention of Corruption Act, will give the enforcing agency a lot of teeth to proceed against persons suspected of money laundering.

The committee, which is engaged in drafting the proposed bill, is yet to decide on how to tackle transactions under Rs one crore, which are prima facie found to have been earned through dubious sources. It has been proposed by the committee that for investigations to be undertaken by an agency, a floor limit for transactions should be set at Rs one crore.

However, there is a slight difference of opinion on whether the gravity of offence in earning money from the sales of arms and drug peddling should be treated on par with customs evasion or even gambling and prostitution. There is also an opinion in the committee that there should be differentiation in the gravity of the offence according to the source of the money.

To arm the enforcing agency with enough powers, it has also been decided that these offences would be made cognizable - i.e. no warrants of arrest would be required if the agency sought the arrest of an accused person. This would also mean that the powers of arrest of the Enforcement Directorate may have to be done away with.

In addition, the bill is also expected to provide that properties acquired with the help of money earned from banned activities - the sale of arms or drugs, gambling and prostitution could be attached by the enforcing agency. The appeal against this would only be entertained by the High Courts though the trials would take place at the district level courts.

Commercial banks will also be required to inform intelligence and enforcement agencies of huge transactions. The limit for these transactions could not be ascertained. However, the decision on the agency which is to enforce the provisions in the bill is yet to be finalised.

Officials of several agencies including the Enforcement Directorate, Central Bureau of Investigation, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence are engaged in the drafting of the proposed bill. It was to be introduced in the Parliament during the budget session but the draft could not be finalised.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 29 1997 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story