'Not satisfied with GST Council's decision: Manish Sisodia

Higher the rate, the more businesses try to evade taxes

‘Not satisfied with GST Council’s decision: Manish Sisodia
Manish Sisodia
Dilasha Seth New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 17 2017 | 3:54 AM IST
Lower rates will lead to higher rate of compliance, says Delhi Finance Minister Manish Sisodia, a day after GST cuts were made effective. He tells Dilasha Seth that the rate of 5 per cent on restaurants should have been extended to restaurants in five-star hotels, as the higher rate could encourage evasion and even lead to inspector raj in some cases. Edited excerpts:

Several big decisions were taken by the GST Council last week, which came into effect on Wednesday. What impact do you foresee?

I am not completely satisfied with the decisions taken by the Council. The benefit of reducing rates on restaurants to 5 per cent will benefit consumers across the country. But, this should have been extended to restaurants in five-star hotels as well. There should be one tax on all restaurants. 

Could you explain it further?

The 18 per cent tax is on restaurants in hotels, which charge Rs 7,500 per night or more. The price changes with season and peak days. Some days of the month, the price will be Rs 5,000, while on other days it might go over Rs 7,500 per night. These are loose ends, which may lead to inspector raj. Some ministers backed the proposal of across-the-board 5 per cent tax, while others did not.

What impact on the revenue do you see from the reduction in rates of over 200 items by the Council?

The rate of compliance will improve. In fact, higher the rate, the more businesses try to evade taxes, and instead pay the tax inspector. We did this experiment in Delhi. As soon as we reduced the tax rate from 12.5 per cent to 5 per cent, our collections did not go down, but were rather up in some items. So, if you are getting the same revenue despite a 7.5 per cent reduction in tax rate, it suggests an improved rate of compliance.

Do you expect the items basket in the 28 per cent bracket shrinking further?

I am of the view that except sin goods such as tobacco, cigarette, revolver, etc, no other item should be taxed at 28 per cent. Why should items such as marble and other common-use items be taxed at 28 per cent?

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story