With the armed forces insisting on a pay hike, the government said it is “very difficult” to maintain a balance in the salaries of government servants doing varied jobs. “It is a very difficult exercise. Because it is not just a question of ensuring that people get better salaries. It is also a question of parities ...balances,” Cabinet Secretary KM Chandrasekhar told PTI in an interview.
He was responding to a question on what steps the government was contemplating in view of the armed forces’ demand for pay parity.
Chandrasekhar said issues become more complicated when people start feeling that they are being discriminated against by the Pay Commission recommendations.
“It is very difficult when people feel that this chap has got more than me...That feeling is there. So, to maintain that kind of balance.... it is very difficult,” he said.
The cabinet secretary said the ministerial committee headed by External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee, who had held both defence and finance portfolios earlier, was working to find out a solution to the demands of the defence forces.
The armed forces have recently strongly conveyed to the government that there should be “no dilution” on their demands for pay parity.
This comes in the wake of reports that the government was trying to find a “middle path” to break the deadlock over the armed forces’ demands that included placing Army Lieutenant Colonels and their equivalents in the Navy and Air Force in Pay Band-4.
The cabinet secretary said when the armed forces raised the issue of pay parity, the committee of secretaries took it up immediately and deliberated on how to find a solution to it for the satisfaction of the defence personnel.
“When the armed forces raised the issue, we sat together at the official level with Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister PM Nair and decided that the best thing would be to request the higher level.”
Chandrasekhar said a “large majority” of government officials, including the Group C and Group D employees, accepted the Pay Commission recommendations and were “more or less satisfied”.
“I do not have too many complaints and whatever complaints are there, we have created a mechanism. We got the anomaly committee, we got a fast track committee to look into those issues,” he said.
Highlighting the difficult task carried out by the Sixth Pay Commission while framing the recommendations, Chandrasekhar said they had to make a huge change in the structure.
"See, normally we used to get pay scales. Here we have gone away from pay scales to the pay band structure, which is an entirely different structure. So, to maintain the parity was pretty difficult. But still I think we did a pretty good job," he said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
