While four of the seven external members sought a cut in the repo rate, Rajan had kept the rate unchanged at eight per cent, saying retail inflation was still higher than RBI’s medium-term tolerance level.
While three members sought a cut of 25 basis points (bps), one argued for a 50-bps cut.
Also Read
The central bank has set a CPI-based inflation target of six per cent by January 2016. For January 2015, the target has been set at eight per cent.
In September, CPI-based inflation stood at 6.46 per cent, the lowest since January 2012, owing to a fall in the prices of fruits and vegetables.
The three external members who sought the repo rate be kept unchanged felt if the rate of disinflation was faster than anticipated, there might be a case for a rate cut, particularly if inflation expectations softened.
Some members derived comfort from the recent decline in inflation, saying they expected inflationary expectations of households would see a sharp drop, if food prices corrected.
At the monetary policy review, one of the external members cited the sharp decline in Wholesale Price Index (WPI)-based inflation. In September, WPI inflation eased to a five-year low of 2.38 per cent, compared with 3.74 per cent the previous month and 7.05 per cent in September 2013.
On the state of the Indian economy, the members said while the market sentiment had improved, economic activity continued to be weak, adding there was a disconnect between activity in the corporate sector and buoyancy in the capital market.
“The pick-up in real GDP (gross domestic product) growth in the first quarter of 2014-15 was primarily due to a favourable base effect. In the second quarter, the base effect will turn unfavourable and growth could register a fall; it might remain below potential for some time to come,” the minutes of the meeting said.
On the global economic environment, some members felt India would gain from a revival in economic activity in the US because the beneficial effects through higher trade and investment could partially offset the adverse impact of expected capital outflows. The members felt markets might have already factored in some of the likely action by the US Federal Reserve on monetary tightening.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)