Caught in the headlights: Here's a look at three big rip-offs in UCBs

Weak governance, poor internal controls, political interference and dual regulation by state governments and the Reserve Bank of India - just about everything which can go wrong at UCBs

PMC Bank
PMC Bank
Business Standard
2 min read Last Updated : Oct 02 2019 | 11:19 PM IST
Urban cooperative banks (UCBs) have, over the years, found themselves at the end of a bad bargain. Weak governance, poor internal controls, political interference and dual regulation by state governments and the Reserve Bank of India — just about everything which can go wrong at UCBs. Some have cleverly played the system — after all, a slave with two masters, is a free man. Below is a look at the three big rip—offs over the last two decades.

Madhavpura Mercantile Co-operative Bank (MMCB) goes bust (2001): The Ahmedabad-based MMCB played wildly by doling out funds to stock brokers in gross violation of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) norms. It issued pay orders worth Rs 1,200 crore to stock broker, Ketan Parekh, which he discounted with Bank of India. MMCB also lent money to Mukesh Babu and Sirish Maniar of the Maniar Group. The mess saw deposits in UCBs in Gujarat drop by Rs 1,500 crore in FY02, and by another 10 per cent in FY03. MMCB’s licence was cancelled on June 4, 2012.

UCBs and Home Trade (2002): The Navi-Mumbai firm Home Trade bought government securities (G-Secs) on behalf of co-operative banks, including UCBs. The Nagpur District Central Cooperative Bank’s chairman, Sunil Kedar, filed a criminal complaint against the company for not delivering G-Secs of Rs 125 crore. A few UCBs also found themselves at the wrong end of the bad bargain; large sums of money found their way to the bourses. While the RBI had put in a delivery versus payment’s system for G-sec trading by banks, it had allowed cooperative banks to deal in physical securities. On April 20, 2002, RBI said that UCBs should not undertake any purchase or sale transactions with broking firms or other intermediaries on principal-to-principal basis.

Prudential UCB (2003): It had been in existence for 82 years and had deposits of Rs 560 crore and advances of Rs 450 crore when it all turned sour. It lent to a defaulter with many other banks, as much as Rs 24 crore and also to high-risk segments such as real estate, clubs, resorts and film studios. The UCB reported non-performing assets (NPA) of 30.8 per cent (Rs 139.05 crore), but the central bank found that it was actually 66.5 per cent or Rs 300.22 crore.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :cooperative banksUrban cooperative banksPMC Bank

Next Story