RBI's stand on IL&FS exposure spells trouble for banks, NBFCs

Firms that provided for exposure on a voluntary basis may now have to mark the same as NPAs

IL&FS
IL&FS
Hamsini Karthik
2 min read Last Updated : Apr 18 2019 | 1:18 AM IST
In an explanation to the ongoing dispute on whether or not loan exposures to stressed infrastructure major IL&FS are to be classified as non-performing assets (NPA), the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) clarified to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal or NCLAT that it is the obligation of banks to mark any loan as such after a default of 90 days. Banks cannot be relieved of their obligations to classify bad loans in their account books, the RBI added.

While this is a part of the RBI’s argument in the ongoing litigation, for banks and non-banking finance companies (NBFCs), its implication could be pronounced. For one, these financial entities have been providing for their exposures in IL&FS from the September 2018 quarter voluntarily and more out of prudence, albeit lower than what regulations would have required. That’s because the account, according to most lenders, remained ‘standard’ till December 2018 quarter.

However, the RBI’s assertion on the matter could change the narrative. “Until the December quarter, banks had not recognised their exposure to IL&FS group as NPA. Now they will have to,” says Kajal Gandhi of ICICI Securities. This, in turn, means an imminent increase in provisioning costs and a consequent drag on the financials of banks and NBFCs.

Since the extent of provisioning may not be uniform across the system, analysts say the March quarter (Q4) may witness a spike in provisioning costs for some of these entities, over and above what was already factored in. Moreover, the analysts add that the trouble from the IL&FS loans may even extend beyond Q4.

According to Siddharth Purohit of SMC Capital, not all banks will be impacted the same way. “IndusInd Bank has made adequate provisioning for the holding company exposure of Rs 1,000 crore, though provisioning may increase on loans to subsidiary companies,” he adds. As for public sector banks, with exposure higher to subsidiary companies, analysts expect a steeper increase in provisioning costs for them. Among NBFCs, L&T Finance with Rs 1,800 crore has the highest exposure to IL&FS group. HDFC too has about Rs 450 crore of exposure to the infrastructure major.

In short, while the extent of pain could vary, it stretches the road to recovery for banks, especially government-owned and compounds the earnings pressure for NBFCs. 

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story