Deeper trend pushes Indian vote on Lanka censure

Jyoti Malhotra New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 12 2013 | 1:15 PM IST
 
The government and a part of the ruling United Progressive Alliance are ranged on different sides of the vote for or against Sri Lanka at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva later this month.

The government believes censuring Sri Lankan president Mahinda Rajapaksa in Geneva would make him lose face and worsen the plight of Tamils in that country. But, with both the DMK, a partner of the UPA alliance, and its AIADMK political foe, presently ruling Tamil Nadu, hoping to win the hearts and minds of people in that state in preparation for general elections next year, the Congress party has little choice but to defer to this mood.

Thus, for a second year running, India is preparing to vote against Sri Lanka, a reminder of how the power of regional politics is over-ruling the big picture that foreign policy stalwarts have for decades been used to drawing in Delhi.

For years, foreign affairs was seen as a sacred cow, somehow divorced from the rough-and-tumble of everyday living. As politics becomes increasingly federal, it makes far more sense for parliamentarians from all sides to get much more involved in the politics of foreign policy, especially with the neighbourhood.

Delhi's biggest concern is that Rajapaksa's humiliation in Geneva might anger him into deferring elections in the Northern province, as well as postponing greater economic integration with India. There is concern that he might taunt India by inviting the Chinese to take greater part in the economic reconstruction of his country.

But if Indian parliamentarians of all colours were to interact much more intensively with their counterparts in Lanka and in other parts of the neighbourhood, it might help both sides understand each other's compulsions. Getting much more involved, not less, is a sign of India deep embrace of its neighbourhood.

In the run up to national elections next year, political parties will realign and rejig alliances with each other. At last, foreign policy will be part of the main menu, not above it as has been the case all these years.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper

First Published: Mar 11 2013 | 12:36 AM IST

Next Story