Donald Trump's coronavirus remedy with malaria drugs defies science

The moment of discord between Trump and one of the nation's most trusted authorities on the coronavirus was a clash between opinion and fact

Donald trump
US President Donald Trump at The White House. AP
Katie Thomas & Denise Grady | NYT
2 min read Last Updated : Mar 21 2020 | 10:52 PM IST
At a long-winded White House briefing on Friday, President Trump enthusiastically and repeatedly promoted the promise of two long-used malaria drugs that are still unproven against the coronavirus, but being tested in clinical trials.
 
“I’m a smart guy,” he said, while acknowledging he couldn’t predict the drugs would work. “I feel good about it. And we’re going to see. You’re going to see soon enough.”
 
But the nation’s leading infectious disease expert,  Anthony S. Fauci, delicately — yet forcefully — pushed back from the same stage, explaining that there was only anecdotal evidence that the drugs, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, may be effective.
 
“The president feels optimistic about something, has feelings about it,” said Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, emphasising that he was a scientist. “I am saying it may be effective.”
 
Trump’s boosterish attitude toward the drugs has deepened worries among doctors and patients with lupus and other diseases who rely on the drugs, because the idea that the old malaria drugs could work against the coronavirus has circulated widely in recent weeks and fuelled shortages that have already left people rushing to fill their prescriptions.
 
“Rheumatologists are furious about the hype going on over this drug,” said Michael Lockshin, of the Hospital for Special Surgery in Manhattan. “There is a run on it and we’re getting calls every few minutes, literally, from patients who are trying to stay on the drug and finding it in short supply.”
 
The moment of discord between Trump and one of the nation's most trusted authorities on the coronavirus was a clash between opinion and fact. It threw Trump’s faith in his own instincts into conflict with the careful, evidence-based approach of scientists like  Fauci, who has held his position since the presidency of Ronald Reagan.
 
© 2020 The New York Times News Service


One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :CoronavirusUS President Trump

Next Story