St Louis Fed President James Bullard told Reuters he still favoured hiking rates at the Fed's next policy-setting meeting in mid-September, though he added that his colleagues would be hesitant to do so if global markets were volatile at that time.
Loretta Mester, head of the Cleveland Fed and another so-called hawk who sometimes runs against the grain at the central bank, said the US economy still could handle a modest rate hike, though she did not commit to backing a move at the September 16-17 meeting.
Their comments suggest the next three weeks will be critical as Fed policymakers weigh whether concerns about a slowing Chinese economy, the rising dollar, and falling commodity prices pose too deep a threat to US inflation and economic growth for them to raise rates for the first time in nearly a decade.
The Fed's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) "does not like to move right in the middle of a global financial storm," Bullard said in an interview on the sidelines of a global central bankers' conference here.
"So one of the advantages we have is that this storm is occurring now and, at least as of now, we think it will be settled down by the time we actually got to the FOMC meeting," he added. "If markets are extremely volatile right in the run-up to a meeting, everyone says the same thing - why don't we wait for this thing to settle down, see where it shakes out, and once we see that we'll make a decision."
Concerns about China's economy have whipsawed stock prices this week, including on Wall Street, even while US economic data has been robust.
The US government reported this week that the economy grew at a 3.7 per cent annualised pace in the second quarter, sharply higher than its previous estimate, and that consumer spending, which accounts for more than two-thirds of economic activity, rose again in July.
Investors and economists have been betting the Fed would delay a policy tightening to December or later, prolonging years of monetary stimulus that pumped trillions of dollars into the global banking system.
"We're still watching how it unfolds. So I wouldn't want to go ahead and decide right now what the case is: more compelling, less compelling, etcetera," Fed Vice-Chairman Stanley Fischer told CNBC on Friday when asked about the prospect of a September rate hike.
Fischer's remarks prompted traders to add bets the Fed would raise rates by the end of the year, with overnight indexed swap rates implying a 35 per cent chance of a hike next month and a 77 per cent chance of such a move at the Fed's December meeting.
US stocks were mixed after days of tumultuous trading that featured both the market's worst day in four years and biggest two-day gain since the 2007-2009 financial crisis.
'Hang out' after a hike
The recent market volatility prompted New York Fed President William Dudley, a close advisor to Fed Chair Janet Yellen, to say on Wednesday that a September rate hike now appeared less compelling.
Mester, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal published on Friday, said the US economy remained "solid" and able to absorb a rate hike. But, she added, "I want to take the time I have between now and the September meeting to evaluate all the economic information that's come in, including recent volatility in markets and the reasons behind that."
Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota, who has long argued against lifting rates any time soon, said he does not see a case for a rate increase this year unless there is a major change in the economic outlook. "Barring that, I don't see a near-term increase in interest rates as being appropriate, and by near-term I mean really through the course of 2015," he told CNBC from Jackson Hole.
Kocherlakota, who will leave the Fed at the end of the year to return to academia, said he thought it would take years for the US economy to be strong enough to generate a healthier amount of inflation, and that it would be appropriate to consider further stimulus.
Bullard told Reuters the Fed could hike rates once then "hang out" at that level if inflation remains too low.
"Nothing has happened here that is so radically changing the US outlook that the basic trajectory of policy would change," he said of the market turmoil.
"My preference would be, and we have a strategy, to go sooner but go gradually. So let's get going, and we can adjust the pace of increases depending on how data come in on the US economy and the forecast evolves," said Bullard, who previously said there was a case for hiking rates next month.
Inflation has remained below the Fed's two per cent target for a few years.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)