“Among the debt basket of products, credit risk funds fetch higher management fee. However, following the Franklin Templeton MF episode, the category has seen sharp erosion of assets,” said a senior executive of a fund house.
According to the data from Association of Mutual Funds in India (Amfi), at the end of June, credit risk funds managed Rs 29,423 crore of assets, which was 53 per cent less than the assets managed at the end of December last year.
“Across the industry, there has been a shift from higher fee-yielding credit risk funds toward lower fee-yielding debt products,” said Srikanth Matrubai, chief executive officer of Sri Kavi Wealth.
Credit risk funds usually fetch between 1.5 per cent and 1.9 per cent expense ratio, depending on the fund house and size of the scheme.
The total expense ratio (TER) structure laid down by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) allows higher TERs on smaller-sized schemes.
“Investor sentiment towards credit risk funds is unlikely to revive in the medium term. Over the next eight-nine months, there will be risks of downgrades and defaults, keeping investors wary of this category,” said an MF advisor.
In June, credit risk funds saw net outflows of Rs 1,493 crore, as against Rs 19,238 crore in April when Franklin Templeton MF announced winding up of six of its schemes.
The reduction in the asset base of credit risk funds comes at a time, when the industry’s overall share of equity:debt mix has been tilting towards the latter.
“This will have a drag on the overall earnings profile of the industry as equity schemes typically fetch higher fees than debt products. However, one must bear in mind that the MF industry has shown resilience and grown assets over the last several years despite various challenges,” said Joydeep Sen, a consultant at Phillip Capital.
According to industry estimates, the share of equity in the industry’s overall asset mix stood at 36.5 per cent in the June quarter, as against 38 per cent in the corresponding quarter last year. The share of debt and liquid schemes stood at 54 per cent in the June quarter, as against 51.7 per cent in the corresponding quarter last year.
The balance 9.34 per cent (for June quarter) was accounted for by other scheme categories.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)