However, communications from FMC reviewed by Business Standard showed several months before this, the Ministry of Consumer Affairs had nominated FMC as the designated agency, through the first gazette notification.
The designated agency was supposed to provide oversight over all spot exchanges granted exemption under section 27 of FCRA. FMC had also framed a reporting format to monitor the fulfillment of conditions laid down under the 2007 notification and had sent it to NSEL in September 2011.
NSEL investors say the letter disproves the contention that NSEL was an unregulated entity, as it was under the purview of the commodities regulator since 2011, if not earlier. Many investors fighting to recover their dues came into the picture in 2011-12. Confessions by former NSEL managing director Anjani Sinha and its warehouse chief Jai Bahukhandi show most of the 24 borrowers entered into agreements with the exchange in 2011-12.
In a September 13, 2011, letter addressed to the managing director of NSEL, FMC’s deputy director, Vishal Nair, referred to a letter from the ministry appointing FMC as the designated agency. The letter, with the subject “Regulation of national spot exchanges” said, “I am directed to refer to this office letter of even number dated August 10, 2011, on the above mentioned subject, enclosing therewith a letter from the Department of Consumer Affairs nominating Forward Markets Commission as the designated agency for providing oversight over all spot exchanges.”
The letter clarifies a copy of the ministry’s letter nominating FMC was sent to NSEL on August 10, 2011. This means the actual nomination of FMC predates this letter. Following this, FMC took steps to ensure the conditions laid down under the 2007 notification were fulfilled. In the letter, Nair said, “In this connection, this office has framed a reporting format for monitoring the fulfillment of conditions prescribed while granting exemptions under section 27 of FCRA.”
The FMC goes on to seek the exchange’s suggestions on whether a different format of reporting would enable more effective monitoring of the “compliance of conditions”. However, the letter didn’t point to any effort by the FMC to conduct physical checks of commodities to ensure the conditions were fulfilled. If it had, the crisis could have been averted, said an NSEL investor.
NSEL-REGULATED OR NOT?
- MCA gave conditional exemption to NSEL in 2007
- One condition was to have a designated agency
- In 2011 letter, FMC referred to its appointment as the designated agency
- FMC also sought a ministry notification, giving it powers
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)