These include Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Luxembourg, Denmark, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Norway, Liechtenstein, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal, Finland and the UK.
As per the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) finalised between Sebi and its European peers, they would be able to "consult, cooperate and exchange information" with regard to the supervision and oversight of AIFs, as also their managers and other related entities.
Also Read
These MoUs have been finalised at the initiative of the EU region capital markets regulator, European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), as part of the European Parliament's Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD).
The MoUs provide for "ongoing, informal, oral consultations, supplemented by more in-depth cooperation" between Sebi and its 31 European counterparts, as also the written exchange of non-public information whenever necessary.
Besides, the regulators would also facilitate for each other the cross-border on-site visits in connection with their regulatory and supervisory functions.
Under the AIFMD regime, such cooperation agreements have been made necessary for allowing such funds and their managers from outside EU region to access any of the EU market or perform their fund management businesses by delegation from EU-based entities.
The treaties would allow the EU and non-EU authorities will be able to supervise fund managers that operate on a cross-border basis both within and outside Europe. The co-operation would also include mutual assistance in the enforcement of the respective laws.
As per the MoU, "no domestic secrecy, blocking laws or regulations should prevent an authority (Sebi etc) from providing assistance to other authorities", although any of its signatories can deny information on the grounds of the national public interest.
The cooperation are aimed to be most useful in cases like initial application, on-going oversight, regulatory approvals or supervisory actions and enforcement actions with regard to the AIFs and their managers.
Besides, Sebi and its counterparts would need to inform each other about any material event that could adversely impact the covered entity and the overall market. For any forward passage of information received under the MoU, the regulators would need to take a permission from the other party.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)