Centre cannot bypass judiciary, has to appoint remaining judges: Justice (Retd) Fakhruddin

Image
ANI New Delhi [India]
Last Updated : Nov 19 2016 | 5:42 PM IST

Acknowledging that the tiff between the judiciary and the Centre is becoming apparent after the Supreme Court refused to accept the latter's stand on rejecting 43 names for appointment, former Delhi High Court Judge, Justice (Retired) Fakhruddin on Saturday said the government has no choice but to pay heed and forward the appointments to President Pranab Mukkherjee.

"The legal and constitutional position is, as it stands today, till the new procedures are adopted or passed, the government has to forward the appointments to the president, even after the Centre sent back appointments for the reconsideration and SC reiterated it stand. Now as per the constitutional provision, the government is bound to accept the recommendations and has to appoint them," Fakhruddin told ANI.

Fakhruddin further pointed out that the situation is serious as various positions in high courts are still vacant, thereby affecting the justice delivery system.

"We are already facing with economic emergency (demonetisation), now a third kind of emergency is erupting," he said.

"All the courts have been working from morning till evening. Now the high courts are not functioning because of pending vacancies and making the pendency of the cases too long," he added.

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to accept the government's rejection of 43 names of the 77 it had recommended for judicial appointments in High Courts.

Only 34 names out of the 77 were accepted by the government.

"We have reiterated all the 43 names for the appointment of judges of high courts which were rejected by the government and have been sent back for reconsideration," a bench comprising Chief Justice T.S. Thakur and A.R Dave said.

The Centre had on November 11 informed the apex court that it has returned over half the names recommended to it for appointment as high court judges by the Collegium

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi had told the top court that the Collegium is yet to respond to the draft Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) that the Centre had submitted to it on August 7 this year.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 19 2016 | 5:29 PM IST

Next Story