The Delhi High Court on Monday dismissed a plea seeking to bar the media from publishing allegations of sexual harassment against Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.
While dismissing the petition, a Bench of Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice Anup Jairam Bambani said the petitioner can approach the Supreme Court instead.
Petition BR Harish Babu sought restriction on the media from further telecast or publishing the allegations till the conclusion of the enquiry.
"Mere a false allegation affidavit, filed in Hon'ble Supreme Court on 19th April 2019 by the dismissed employee of the office of the CJI which is a notarized document cannot be built as a pillar to put allegations on the Chief justice of India," the petitioner submitted.
The petitioner, an authorized signatory of 'Anti-Corruption Council of India' trust, sought strong action against social media giants like WhatsApp and Google for their alleged involvement in circulating and re-casting the defamatory content against the CJI.
The plea further said: "The petitioner strongly suspects that the news rotated putting an allegation against the Chief Justice of India is paid news which reflects direct hit on the image of the country itself by the country media."
The writ petition made respondents to the Union of India, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, the government of NCT of Delhi, Press Council of India, Scroll News, Commissioner of Police, and operational heads of WhatsApp, Google, YouTube and LinkedIn.
Lawyer Utsav Bains had claimed that former apex court employees came together to frame sexual harassment charge against Justice Gogoi with the help of some powerful lobbyists.
CJI Gogoi has been accused of sexual assault by a former female employee who worked as a junior assistant at the Supreme Court between May 2014 and December 2018.
A three-member in-house committee led by Justice S A Bobde, the senior-most judge after the Chief Justice, and including Justice NV Ramana and Justice Indira Banerjee was formed to look into the allegation against the CJI.
However, Justice Ramana, on Thursday recused himself from the committee following objections from the complainant.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
