EU politically driven over triggering Article 7: Poland

Image
ANI London [United Kingdom]
Last Updated : Dec 21 2017 | 3:00 AM IST

Poland has alleged the European Commission (EC) of a politically motivated attack after the latter prompted a process that could witness the country stripped of its voting rights in Brussels.

For the first time, the EC has triggered Article 7 which is regarded as a nuclear option in the EU affairs, against Poland over a judicial reform dispute, saying that there is a clear risk of a stern breach of the rule of law in Poland, reported the Guardian.

The Polish government insists that the measures are required to overhaul the judicial system and battle corruption. Brussels, however, is of the opinion that the reforms threaten rule of law in the country, according to the reports.

The EC has also formally advised the other 27 member states that the legislative programme of Poland's government is putting at risk the fundamental values expected of a democratic state, including judicial independence.

13 laws, adopted over the past several years by Warsaw, have created a situation, where the Polish government "can systematically politically interfere with the composition, powers, the administration and the functioning" of the judicial authorities, according to the commission's Vice-President Frans Timmermans.

"Judicial reforms in Poland mean that the country's judiciary is now under the political control of the ruling majority. In the absence of judicial independence, serious questions are raised about the effective application of EU law," he added.

According to the Guardian, Poland's new prime minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, in a Twitter Post, stated that, "Poland is as devoted to the rule of law as the rest of the EU."

The Polish foreign ministry said in a statement: "Poland deplores the European commission's launch of the procedure [...] which is essentially political, not legal."

In July, the Polish parliament introduced a set of draft laws to reform the judiciary system. Polish President Andrzej Duda vetoed two of these bills, which concerned the National Council of Judiciary and the Supreme Court, but reintroduced them once amended.

Nevertheless, they were criticized by the EC since they threatened the principle of the separation of powers.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 21 2017 | 3:00 AM IST

Next Story