Plea filed in SC seeking status of probe in disproportionate assets case against Mulayam, Akhilesh

Image
ANI General News
Last Updated : Feb 23 2019 | 11:10 AM IST

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking direction for the CBI to place before it or jurisdictional magistrate the status report of investigation carried out by the agency into alleged disproportionate assets of Samajwadi Party founder Mulayam Singh Yadav and his son and party president Akhilesh Yadav.

The petition filed by Vishwanath Chaturvedi, an advocate, said that the CBI has utterly failed to intimate either to the apex court or report to the jurisdictional magistrate on the investigation and status of the case as directed by the court in two judgments.

Mulayam had allegedly amassed disproportionate assets worth over Rs 100 crore during his tenure as the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh between 1999 and 2005.

The CBI has taken an unusually long time to complete the preliminary inquiry in the highly sensitive and important matter of a long-pending investigation since 2007, said the plea, adding that even after the loss of 11 years when the verdict had come and six years after the order on review petition, the CBI has not acted in the case.

"The judgment delivered by this court on December 13, 2012, in review petitions, this court had left it completely to the CBI how the enquiry is to be proceeded with. This Court has gone so far as to hold that CBI is an independent agency is not bound to share the reports with the Union of India, almost six years lapsed from the review orders and 11 long years lapsed from the writ order...," the plea said.

In 2005, Chaturvedi had filed a plea in the apex court seeking CBI inquiry against Mulayam Singh Yadav, his sons Akhilesh and Prateek Yadav and daughter-in-law Dimple Yadav, under the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly acquiring assets more than the known source of their income by misusing their power of authority.

In its March 2007 judgement, the Supreme Court had ordered the CBI to inquire into allegations against Yadav family and submit a report of its preliminary inquiry to the Centre.

The Yadav family later filed a review petition against 2007 verdict and in its December 2012 judgement, the top court gave the CBI complete freedom to go about the inquiry into allegations of disproportionate wealth.

However, the court had modified its 2007 order to exempt Dimple Yadav from the inquiry as she had not held any public post during the period under the scanner.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 23 2019 | 10:50 AM IST

Next Story