SC declines to pass any direction to Centre on AGR over Vodafone-Idea's plea

Image
ANI General News
Last Updated : Feb 17 2020 | 2:10 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to pass an order on Vodafone-Idea's plea to direct the central government not to encash its bank guarantee in view of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) judgement.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Vodafone-India, mentioned the matter before a bench of Justice Arun Mishra and said that it will deposit Rs 2,500 crore with the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) today and Rs 1,000 crore by Friday, and it needs more time to deposit the entire amount arising out of the AGR judgement.

Rohatgi requested to not take any 'coercive measures" against the company, including encashment of its bank guarantees with the government.

After hearing Rohatgi, Mishra declined to pass any instruction to the government.

The Supreme Court, while hearing a plea on payment of dues under the AGR case on Friday, had observed how the telecom companies had violated its order "in pith and substance" and not paid the money to the Centre.A three-judge bench headed by Mishra said: "This case projects a very disturbing scenario. The companies have violated the order passed by this court in pith and substance. In spite of the dismissal of the review application, they have not deposited any amount so far."Justice Mishra, in his order, also made it clear that it appears that the way in which things are happening shows "scant respect to the directions issued by the top court.""A desk officer of the DoT has the temerity to pass the order to the effect of issuing a direction to the accountant general, another constitutional authority, not to insist for any payment pursuant to the order passed by this court and not to take any coercive steps till further orders," the court had observed.Warning the telecom companies of initiation of contempt proceedings against them and a desk officer of the DoT, the top had court ruled, "This is nothing but a device to scuttle order of this court. This kind of order should not have been passed by the desk officer at all.""In the circumstances, we draw contempt proceedings against the desk officer for passing the order and violating the order passed by this court," it added.The telecom companies had appealed before the top court challenging its AGR verdict on Rs 92,000 crore past dues on them. The apex court had upheld the central government's plea on the definition of AGR involving around Rs 90,000 crore.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 17 2020 | 1:59 PM IST

Next Story